HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27318 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Mohd. Naushad, learned counsel for the opposite party, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 357 of 2026 under Sections -109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 352, 333 BNS Police Station - Kairana District -Shamli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that, in the First Information Report, the role of causing injury has been specifically attributed to the co-accused, Sadam, who is the husband of the present applicant. However, subsequently, in the statement of the injured recorded during the course of investigation, the role of causing the injury has been attributed to the present applicant. Thus, there is a material contradiction between the version contained in the FIR and the statement of the injured recorded during the course of investigation. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the matter. There is no criminal history against the applicant.The applicant is in jail since 03.06.2026. Therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, the applicant would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co- operate in the trial. 4. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the above contention Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohd. Naushad Sanno .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let applicant - Sanno be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 7. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 8. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 9, 2026 S.K. BAIL No. 27318 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad