Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53732 (KAR)

SRI BABASAB KALLAPPA DESAI v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HIPPARAGI PROJECT ATHANI

WP/100841/2025 · 2026-01-12

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:290 WP No. 100841 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 100841 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. BABASAB KALLAPPA DESAI AGE: 79 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KOKATANUR, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI -591 304. 2. SRI. ASHOKKUMAR KALLAPPA DESAI AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KOKATANUR, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI - 591 304. 3. SRI. BALASAB KALLAPPA DESAI AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KOKATANUR, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI - 591 304. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.H.BAGI, ADVOCATE) MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.01.14 10:53:18 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:290 WP No. 100841 of 2025 AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HIPPARAGI PROJECT, ATHANI, TQ: ATHNAI, DIST: BELAGAVI - 591 304. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA NIRAVARI NIGAM LTD., HBC DIVISION, ATHANI - 591 304. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K.UPPAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. LINGESH V.KATTEMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION MADE UNDER SECTION 28 A OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894, GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 02/02/2024 THROUGH ITS VIDE ANNEXURE-D, BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:290 WP No. 100841 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under; The petitioner above named respectfully submit as under: That, the counsel for petitioner is instructed from the trial court advocate that, the petitioner is not interested to prosecute and hence same may kindly be dismissed as not pressed in the ends of justice. Hence, it is prayed that the top noted writ petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA PJ/ Ct:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33