DEEPAK S/O SADANAND KUDTARKAR v. SMT. VIDYA W/O VITTAL SUVARNAKAR
CRL.RP/100198/2021 · 2026-02-03
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53722 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53722 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1555 CRL.RP No. 100198 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100198 OF 2021 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
DEEPAK S/O SADANAND KUDTARKAR AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R./O PARAPPA KOOT, HOSAYALLAPUR, DHARWAD - 580001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.G. CHIKKANARAGUND, ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT. VIDYA W/O VITTAL SUVARNAKAR AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK AND LIC AGENT, R./O. C/O. VITTHAL N. SUVARNAKAR H.NO. 19/A, MEGHADOOTH HOUSING SOCIETY, LAXMI ROAD, BHARAT NAGAR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI - 590003. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHRIHARSH A. NEELOPANT, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND
ORDER DATED 29.06.2021 IN CRL. APPEAL NO.417/2019 PASSED BY THE X ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BELAGAVI IN CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER DATED 16.10.2019 IN CC NO.1477/2017 PASSED BY THE VI JMFC COURT, BELAGAVI, AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED, IN THE INTEREST JUSTICE.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1555 CRL.RP No. 100198 of 2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
A joint memo is filed by the parties, signed by the petitioner and learned Advocates for both the parties.
2. Placing the joint memo on record, petition stands
disposed of.
3. It is made clear that if any one of the installments is not paid as agreed in the joint memo, the entire fine amount shall be payable by the petitioner at once and, respondent is at liberty to execute the impugned order.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 4 SL NO.: 12