- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:766 CRL.P No. 103753 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103753 OF 2024 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MAHADESHWAR B. LINGDAL (IN FIR NAME OF PETITIONER WRONGLY SHOWN AS MAHABALESHWAR) AGE. 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS/ AGRICULTURE, R/O. KARAGINAKOPPA, SALGAON, MUNDGOD, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581349. 2. CHANDRASHEKAR B.T. S/O THIMMA BHOVI AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O . BHUCHENAHALLI, KAVALU, SINDIGERE, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577146. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R.H. ANGADI,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, (HUBBALLI SUB URBAN POLICE STATION), R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA , DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580011. 2. SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKAR, SECRETARY SAMRIDHI CO-OP SOCIETY LTD., CENTRAL OFFICE, YALAHANKA, SUB- URBAN, BENGALURU-560029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SUNIL KUMAR S. ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR, COMPLAINT AND ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:766 CRL.P No. 103753 of 2024 SO FAR AS THE PRESENT PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED WHO ARE ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 IN A CASE REGISTERED BY HUBBALLI SUB URBAN POLICE STATION AT THEIR P.S. CRIME NO.107/2024, DATED 10.08.2024, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 308(2) OF BNS-2023, ON THE FILE OF PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUBBALLI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL “Herein the petitioner submit as under: That, the petitioner are in the view of withdrawing the above petition, hence, the above may be dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to challenge chargesheet. Hence, the memo.” 2. Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/- CT:CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 34