IN TH 103 Shawinder Sh. Varun and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B “Shawinde petition wa counsel for 01.3.2026, looked into will be take COCP-2005-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2005 o Date of decision inder Singh Versus arun Sharma, IPS, Senior Superin others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Simranjit singh Makkar, A for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG ASI Ajaib Singh, P.S. Kotwali HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 16.3.2026 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CR winder Singh vs. State of Punjab ion was disposed of on the basis of s sel for the State to the effect that 026, Annexure P-1, regarding the into and if any threat perception is taken, in accordance with law….”. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2005 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-29.04.2026 …..Petitioner perintendent of Police, Patiala …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA kkar, Advocate i, AAG Punjab assisted by otwali, Patiala. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- in CRWP-2907-2026 titled as njab and others”, whereby the is of statement made by learned that “…the representation dated the life and liberty, shall be on is found, appropriate action .”. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.29 17.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document telephonic that in com was looke wherein pr 126, 169 an petitioner namely, Sh taken again petition. learned cou is supplied the materia the Writ C representat law. The m representat action has b there must Court. In th and action COCP-2005-2026 (O & M) It is informed by learned c honic instructions from ASI Ajaib Si in compliance of the said Criminal W looked into and an order dated 13 ein preventive protective action has 169 and 170 of BNSS against the accu ioner is suspecting that his wife is ly, Shamsher Sharma and action, as m against Shamsher Sharma: thus, no c Copy of the said order dated 1 ed counsel for the State, which is take pplied to learned counsel for the petitio I have heard learned counsel aterial available on record. From the record, it transpires Writ Court was limited to conside sentation and to take action, if warr The material placed on record by sentation has, in fact, been considered n has been taken by the competent aut It is well settled that for invo must be willful and deliberate disob t. In the present case, once the repres ction has been taken thereupon, it can 2 rned counsel for the State, on jaib Singh, P.S. Kotwali, Patiala, nal Writ Court order, the matter ted 13.4.2026 has been passed n has been taken under Sections he accused. It is clarified that the having affair with a person, n, as mentioned above, has been s, no cause survives in the present ated 13.4.2026 is handed over by is taken on record. Copy thereof petitioner. unsel for the parties and perused spires that the direction issued by onsideration of the petitioner’s f warranted, in accordance with d by the State reflects that the sidered and necessary preventive nt authority. r invoking contempt jurisdiction, disobedience of the order of the representation stands considered , it cannot be said that there is any VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.29 17.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document intentional 16.03.2026 petition is of. April 29, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2005-2026 (O & M) tional or deliberate non-complian 3.2026. In view of the above noted f ion is dismissed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 mpliance of the order dated oted facts, the present contempt if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.29 17.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document