Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5370 (KAR)

MR. MOHAMMED NADEEM v. SMT. SYEDA SADIYA

MFA/7538/2025 · 2026-02-10

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7538 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR. MOHAMMED NADEEM S/O M.S.RAFIQ, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: ENGINEER, R/AT BEHIND NAVAJYOTHI, KAUSALYABHIVRUDDHI KENDRA, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT, DAVANAGERE. …APPELLANT (BY SRIYUTHS. PRASANNA B.R., SWATHI NAIK., ADVOCATES) AND: SMT. SYEDA SADIYA, W/O MOHAMMED NADEEM, D/O SYED FAZIL HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD, R/AT TAHSILDAR ROAD, BEHIND JAMIYA MASJID, RAYADURGA, ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ..RESPONDENT MFA No.7538/2025 ------------------------- 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S.19(1) of FAMILY COURT ACT, against the Judgment and Decree Dt.28.08.2025 passed in O.S. No.70/2021 on the file of the JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DAVANAGERE, dismissing as not maintainable the suit seeking relief of dissolution of marriage. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections, failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE MFA No.7538/2025 ------------------------- 3 NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.10.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T by: DS R by: NR C by: STE