Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5369 (RAJ)

SUNITA BAI D/O HEMRAJ GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/405/2026 · 2026-03-18

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11725] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 405/2026 1. Sunita Bai D/o Hemraj Gurjar, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Fatehpura, Mara, Distrcit Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Dinesh Kumar Gurjar Son Of Rajaram Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Mara, District Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, District Bundi 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Dei, District Bundi Rajasthan. 5. Hemraj Son Of Shri Shravanji, 6. Kamla Bai Wife Of Hemraj, 7. Ramavtar Son Of Laluji, 8. Heera Lal Son Of Shravan, 9. Mahaveer Son Of Shravan, 10. Lalu Son Of Shravan, 11. Rambhajan Son Of Lalu, 12. Ramphool Son Of Lalu, 13. Devraj Son Of Heeralal, 14. Rajesh Son Of Heeralal, 15. Bablu Son Of Mahaveer Prasad, 16. Banti Son Of Mahaveer Prasad, 17. Ramlal Son Of Prabhulal, Respondents No. 517 are Resident Of Village Fatehpur, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shivani Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP [2026:RJ-JP:11725] (2 of 3) [CRLW-405/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondents No.5 to 17 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. She submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur on 12.03.2026 and same has been registered in the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondents No.5 to 17 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4 - Station House Officer, Police Station Dei, District Bundi (Raj.) and respondent No.4 is directed to provide [2026:RJ-JP:11725] (3 of 3) [CRLW-405/2026] protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/209