Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53678 (KAR)

DURGAPPA S/O. DEVENDRAPPA WADDAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/65148/2011 · 2026-01-30

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1232 WP No. 65148 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 65148 OF 2011 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: 1. DURGAPPA S/O. DEVENDRAPPA WADDAR, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GAMBYAPUR, TQ: KALAGHATAGI, DIST: DHARWAD. 2. BASAVANTAPPA S/O. DEVENDRAPPA WADDAR, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GAMBYAPUR, TQ: KALAGHATAGI, DIST: DHARWAD. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAKASH S.UDIKERI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BANGALORE. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD REVENUE SUB-DIVISION, DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NANDINI B. SOMAPUR, AGA) --- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUNGED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DHARWAD ORDER BEARING NO.LND/CR/105/2010- 11 DATED 30/04/2011 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.02 09:57:50 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1232 WP No. 65148 of 2011 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER This Court on 28.01.2026 passed the following order: “Though the matter is called out twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The writ petition is of the year 2011. List this matter on 30.01.2026 under the caption ‘dismissal’. In the event, there is no appearance on the next date of hearing, appropriate orders would be passed.” The writ petition is of the year 2011. Even today there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA gab Ct:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60