Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53674 (MAD)

M/s.THE JUTE PALACE Represented by its Proprietor Kirubakaran v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (MMDA) Colony Assessment Circle,

WP/26576/2026 · 2026-07-22

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26576 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 26576 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.29074 & 29078 of 2026 M/s.THE JUTE PALACE Represented by its Proprietor Kirubakaran No.236, First Floor, Salma Majestic Tower, Choolaimedu High Road,Chennai - 600094. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (MMDA) Colony Assessment Circle, NO.88, Mayor ramanathan salai, chetpet, chennai - 600031. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned assessment order passed on 22.12.2025 by the respondent against the Petitioners firm in GSTIN 33BGRPK4767N1ZL in Reference No. ZD331225343762J for the Assessment Year 2021-2022 and Quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.M.Malarmannan For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26576 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 22.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26576 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 22-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (MMDA) Colony Assessment Circle, NO.88, Mayor ramanathan salai, chetpet, chennai - 600031. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26576 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 26576 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.29074 & 29078 of 2026 22-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis