Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53667 (MAD)

M/s. Sri Arubathumoovar Nayanmargal Gurupoojai Mutt. v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./123/2026 · 2026-07-15

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.No.123 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.Crl.No.123 of 2026 M/s.Sri Arubathumoovar Nayanmargal Gurupoojai Mutt, Rep.by its Trustee, S.Vanchinathan, Registered Office at Thazhancheri Panchayat, Varakadai, Kotukkai Post, Mayiladuthurai District. Pin - 609 203. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai, Mayiladuthurai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai, Mayiladuthurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Manalmedu Police Station, Manalmedu, Mayiladuthurai District. 4.The Tasildar, O/o. The Tasildar, Mayiladuthurai District. 5.U.Sekar 6.Ramasamy 7.Naraynan ... Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.123 of 2026 Prayer: Writ petition(Crl.) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing Respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 09.01.2025, take appropriate action against Respondents 5 to 7 and provide necessary police protection to the petitioner’s lands from Respondents 5 to 7. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhusudanan For Respondents For R1 to 4 : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) For R5 to 7 : No appearance ORDER This writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 09.01.2025, to take appropriate action against Respondents 5 to 7 and to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner’s lands from respondents 5 to 7. 2. On perusal of the complaint lodged by the petitioner, it is revealed that the petitioner is one of the trustees and the petitioner has some properties and respondents 5 to 7 were tenants. Thereafter, they did not pay rent properly and as such, the petitioner filed eviction petition before revenue court and the same was ordered to evict respondents 5 to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.123 of 2026 7. In support of police aid, respondents 5 to 7 were already evicted from the trust properties. Even then, they are attempting to trespass the very same property and also demolished some portion of some construction of the trust properties. 3. In view of the above, the third respondent is directed to enquire the complaint lodged by the petitioner after issuance of notice to petitioner and respondents 5 to 7, and if any cognizance offence is made out against them, the third respondent is directed to register FIR against them and proceed in accordance with law. 4. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 15.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.123 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, lok To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai, Mayiladuthurai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai, Mayiladuthurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Manalmedu Police Station, Manalmedu, Mayiladuthurai District. 4.The Tasildar, O/o. The Tasildar, Mayiladuthurai District. 5.The Public Prosecutor, High court of madras W.P.Crl.No.123 of 2026 15.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis