Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1139 CRL.P No. 104194 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104194 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
NANDAKISHORE RAJAK S/O RAJKUMAR RAJAK AGE. 24 YEARS OCC. FACTORY WORKER, R/O. RED ROSE WAIN SHOP, NEAR VADDU VILLAGE, SANDUR TQ, BALLARI DIST. 583119.
PERMANENT ADDRESS HAZARIBAGH DIST.
HAZARIBAGH, JHARKAND 825301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. ANWAR BASHA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, (THROUGH THORANAGALLU P S) REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD-580001.
2.
REVANNA S/O YALLAPPA AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. LABOURER, IST WARD NEAR ESHWARA TEMPLE, VADDU VILLAGE, SANDUR TQ.
BALLARI DIST. 583119.
ALSO AT HOSEKERE VILLAGE, GANGAVATI, KOPPAL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. R.H. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. (483 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ON BAIL IN SPL.CASE NO 1397/2019 IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO. 88/2019 REGISTERED IN THORANAGALLU PS BALLARI PUNISHABLE U/S 376AB, 376A, 366, 302, 201 OF IPC AND 6 OF PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2012, PENDING TRIAL OF THE CASE, BEFORE THE I ST ADDL. DISTRICT AND SPECIAL JUDGE F.T.S.C I BALLARI IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1139 CRL.P No. 104194 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:
"Herein, the counsel for the petitioner is that, the above said petition is withdrawn by not pressing in the above matter, hence the petition may be withdrawn by not pressing here the memo.”
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed.
However, taking note of the fact that the petitioner is in the custody for more than six years, learned Trial Magistrate is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 22