[2026:RJ-JP:12980] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3699/2026 Deepak Meena @ Deepak Mahakal S/o Suresh Meena, aged 22 years, Resident of Dhani Guruo Ki, Tan Haripura, Police Station Ajeetgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) (At present confined in Central Jail at Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Kumar Sharma for Mr. Gaurav Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 25/03/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.20/2026 registered at Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) & 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. During investigation, offence punishable under Section 307 of BNS has also been added against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that neither petitioner is named in the FIR nor any allegation has been levelled by the complainant against the petitioner. Counsel submits that the complainant himself appeared before the learned Magistrate [2026:RJ-JP:12980] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3699/2026] and submitted an application stating therein that the petitioner has not committed any offence against him. Counsel submits that certified copy of the said application has also been annexed with this bail application as Annexure-3. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2026 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender as four other cases have been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that complainant of this case himself submitted an application before the learned Magistrate stating therein that petitioner has not committed any offence against him, as also considering the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Deepak Meena @ Deepak Mahakal S/o Suresh Meena shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of [2026:RJ-JP:12980] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3699/2026] Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only), each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. 7. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, it is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till conclusion of the trial. 8. Concerned SHO shall enter attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /91