Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C ) No.6439 of 2026
Prasanta Kumar Dash
…. Petitioner Mr. G.B. Singh, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties Ms. R.R. Jena,Adv.on behalf of Mr. L.K. Maharana, Adv.
COROM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 24.03.2026
1.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:-
In view of the aforesaid
facts and circumstances of this case, it is respectfully prayed that your lordship’s would graciously be pleased to issue Rule NISI, calling upon the Opp. parties to show cause as to why the feasibility report will not be provided in favour of the Petitioner for installation of Solar point on his house and if the Opp. parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, then the rule be made absolute and direct to the Opp. party No.3 i.e. Divisional Manager, Electrical, TPCODL, Salipur electrical Division, Cuttack to provide feasibility report in faovur of consumer number of the Petitioner for smooth installation of Solar Pont for the interest of justice.
Any other relief/reliefs be granted as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.
And for this act of kindness the petitioner is in duty bound shall ever pray.
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner p. 2p. 2 to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of 3(three) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 3 be communicated to the Petitioner.
7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge sangita