Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5362 (KAR)

SRI BABU C v. SHRI V SRINIVASA

MFA/676/2020 · 2026-02-10

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7915 MFA No. 676 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.676 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI BABU C S/O LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. SHRI RAGHAVA REDDY S/O LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 3. SHRI RAMESH S/O LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 4. SHRI RAVI S/O LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. LOKESH S/O LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL NAGAMMA TEMPLE, CHIKKABANASWADI MAIN ROAD, CHIKKABANASWADI, BENGALURU-560043. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VISWANATHA SETTY V.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7915 MFA No. 676 of 2020 AND: 1. SHRI V SRINIVASA S/O LATE P.VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.104, 6TH CROSS, LAXMAIAH GARDEN, SUBBAYYANAPALYA, BENGALURU-560043. 2. SHRI V. SHRINIVASA S/O LATE P.VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO. 218/1, OPP: BUS STOP, DODDA BANASWADI, BENALURU-560043. 3. SHRI R RAMESH S/O LATE RAMAIAH REDDY AND LATE CHANNAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.115, (OLD NO.1004) OLD CHANNASANDRA MAIN ROAD, DODDA BANASWADI, NEAR WATER TANK, WARD NO.27, BENGALURU-560043. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.Nagaraja, counsel on behalf of Sri.Viswanatha Setty V., for the appellants appeared in person and submits that the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7915 MFA No. 676 of 2020 2. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the submission as the appeal having become infructuous. 3. The oral submission is placed on record. 4. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36