Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53601 (KAR)

SHRI. SHARANAGOUDA S/O KAREGOUDA KADUR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/101770/2021 · 2026-01-31

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1315 CRL.P No. 101770 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101770 OF 2021 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. SHARANAGOUDA S/O KAREGOUDA KADUR AGE- 38 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O. ABALURU, TQ. HIREKERUR, DIST. HAVERI-580111. 2. SHRI. KAREGOUDA S/O BASAPPA KADUR AGE- 68 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O. ABALURU, TQ. HIREKERUR, DIST. HAVERI-580111. 3. SUSHILAVVA W/O KAREGOUDA KADUR AGE- 58 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O. ABALURU, TQ. HIREKERUR, DIST. HAVERI-58111. 4. KAVITA W/O DEVANAGOUDA KAREGOUDRA AGE- 31 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KADUR, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI-58116. 5. MAMATA W/O PRASHANT LAKKAKOLLER AGE- 29 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KADUR, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI-58116. 6. JAYAMMA W/O MAHESHAPPA KUSGURU AGE- 32 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KUDUPALI, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI-58116. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAKASH R. BADIGER, ADVOCATE). CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.02 17:04:18 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1315 CRL.P No. 101770 of 2021 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, (HIREKERUR POLICE STATION) R/BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. LATA W/O SHARANGOUDA KADUR AGE- 258 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KUDPALLI, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI-58111. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; NOTICE SERVED TO R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.1068/2021 IN P.C. NO.56/2018 (HBV CRIME NO.7/2019) PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HIREKERURU AS AGAINST THE PRESENT PETITIONERS NOS.1 TO 6/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 6 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 323, 498(a) AND 504 R/W 149 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT-1961. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1315 CRL.P No. 101770 of 2021 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: MEMO “ It is respectfully submitted as under: The parties re settled their dispute before the trial Court. Hence, this petition become infructuous. Hence, permit to withdraw the petition as not pressed.” 2. Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, having become infructuous Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/- CT:CMU LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 31