Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5359 (BOM)

TANAJI ROHIDAS GADE AND ORS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/3051/2026 · 2026-08-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

117.IA.3051.2026.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3051 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.7282 OF 2024 Tanaji Rohidas Gade and Ors. .. Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: Tanaji Rohidas Gade and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents ....................  Mr. Sagar Kursija, Advocate i/by Mr. Anshuman Deshmukh for Applicants / Petitioners.  Mr. Amit Munde, Additional PP for Respondent No.1 – State.  Mr. Manoj Badgujar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : AUGUST 29, 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Kursija, learned Advocate for Applicants / Petitioners; Mr. Munde, learned Additional PP for Respondent No.1 – State and Mr. Badgujar, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. 2. At the outset, Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution by order dated 03.10.2025. Interim Application is filed for setting aside of the order dated 03.05.2025. Interim Application is taken up for hearing. Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c) which read thus:- “b. Delay of 16 days in filing of present interim application may kindly be condoned; c. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to re-call order dated 1 of 2 117.IA.3051.2026.doc 03rd October, 2025 passed in the original writ petition and further be pleased to restore the writ petition to its file”. 3. With the above directions, Interim Application is allowed and disposed. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 2 of 2 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2026.09.01 19:55:47 +0530