MRS VIOLET BANGERA v. MR. MELVIN SUDARSHAN BANGERA
MFA/6646/2025 · 2026-02-10
Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5357 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5357 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6646 OF 2025
BETWEEN
MRS. VIOLET BANGERA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O MELVIN SUDARSHAN BANGERA, R/AT C/O VATSALA SOANS, HEBBE ROAD, TIRUNGANA VILLAGE, MOODABAGILU N.R.PURA TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. …..Appellant s
(By Sri. Prasanna K., Advocate)
AND
MR. MELVIN SUDARSHAN BANGERA, S/O JAYA BANGERA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT SAMRUDHI HOUSE MISSION COMPOUND, MULOOR POST UCHILLA KAUP TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT. …….. Respondent
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S.55 of Indian Divorce Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated
MFA.No.6646/2025 -------------------------
2 29.03.2023 passed in M.C. No.221/2021 (Old No.126/2020) on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Udupi, allowing the petition filed Under Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 for restitution of conjugal right.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections, failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
NOTE: Court Order dated.10.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
COPY
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE