Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5357 (ALL)

MITHILESH KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/16074/2026 · 2026-09-08

Devendra Singh I, Rajiv Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16074 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, Shri Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it. 3. Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.4 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 9, 2026 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kulveer Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Mithilesh Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad