MIRAZUL HOQUE AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
WP(C)/2250/2026 · 2026-05-03
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5356 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5356 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010065472026
2026:GAU-AS:6058
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2250/2026 MIRAZUL HOQUE AND ANR S/O- LATE SOFIAL HOQUE, VILL.- PATAKATA, P.O. PATAKATA, P.S. SOUTH SALMARA, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783127.
2: ZAHIDUL ISLAM S/O-ABDUL AZIZ SHEIKH VILL.- PATAKATA P.O. PATAKATA P.S. SOUTH SALMARA DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM PIN- 783127 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. GOVT OF ASSAM PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SOUTH SALMARA-MANKACHAR DISTRICT HATSINGIMARI ASSAM. PIN-783135 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SOUTH SALMARA-MANKACHAR ZILLA PARISHAD DISTRICT-SOUTH SALMARA-MANKACHAR HATSINGIMARI
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM. PIN-783135 5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER FEKAMARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT DISTRICT-SOUTH SALMARA-MANKACHAR ASSAM. PIN-783135 6:THE SECRETARY PATAKATA GAON PANCHAYAT P.O-PATAKATA P.S-SOUTH SALMARA DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM PIN-78312 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. Islam, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. G. Bokolial, Government Advocate : Mr. S. Dutta, SC, P&RD
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 04.05.2026
Heard Mr. A. Islam, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. S. Dutta, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the P&RD Department.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners herein would not like to pursue the instant writ petition in the present form as there are certain formal defects and would like to file a separate writ petition by removing those formal defects.
Page No.# 3/3
3. Apparently, from a perusal of the writ petition, it appears that there are formal defects.
4. Consequently, this Court closes the instant writ petition on withdrawal.
5. Liberty is given to the Petitioners to re-file by removing those formal defects.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant