CHANNAMALLAYYA BASAYYA NIRAVANI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/101271/2021 · 2026-01-31
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53544 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53544 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1304 CRL.P No. 101271 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101271 OF 2021 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
CHANNAMALLAYYA BASAYYA NIRAVANI AGE. 68 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUDALAGI, TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI.
2.
BASAYYA ERAYYA HIREMATH AGE. 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. MUDALAGI, TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI.
3.
SAGAR SALIMATH AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. MUDALAGI, TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI.
4.
DUDAPPA LAXMAN PIROJI AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. MUDALAGI, TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARAD MALGOUND PATIL,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, MUDALGI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY SATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.
2.
RAJASHEKHAR MALLAPPA NIDAGUNDI AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUDALAGI, TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. SRIHARSH NEELOPANT, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.03 15:09:44 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1304 CRL.P No. 101271 of 2021
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.5 TO 8, IN C.C.NO.1084/2020 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDALGI FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 143, 147, 447, 427, 504, 506 R/W 149 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Office, after verifying National Judicial Data Grid, noticed that the present petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the disposal of the main matter before the Trial Court.
2. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
AC, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 2