SUSHIL KUMAR MALVIYA AND 8 OTHERS v. SHARDA PRASAD AND 6 OTHERS
A227/3458/2026 · 2026-03-18
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 535 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 535 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3458 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri V.K. Shukla and Sri V.K. Baranwal, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1, is taken on record.
2. This petition has been filed challenging an order dismissing the application filed by the petitioners under Order XLI Rule 19 of C.P.C.
3. A preliminary objection has been raised by counsel for the respondent that order is appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(t) of C.P.C.
4. In view of availability of alternative remedy, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
5. The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedy as available to them under law.
6. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents annexed with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining photocopy of the same on record. March 19, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sabhajeet Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sushil Kumar Malviya And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) Sharda Prasad And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad