SHUBHAM KUNTAL S/O SOBRAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1847/2026 · 2026-03-05
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5348 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5348 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9442] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1847/2026 Shubham Kuntal S/o Sobran Singh, R/o Ajan, Police Station Udyog Nagar At Present Phatak No. 39, Simko Labour Colony Nale Ke Pass, Shyam Nagar, Police Station Mathura Gate, District Bharatpur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanay Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 05/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.211/2021 registered at Police Station Mathura Gate, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 323, 341, 307 and 34 of IPC, 1860.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegations levelled against the present petitioner are of causing a gunshot injury to the victim Ajay Singh. He further contends that in the testimony of victim Ajay Singh recorded before the trial Court, he has not supported the prosecution story and have turned hostile. Petitioner is behind the bars since 24.09.2024. The trial of the
[2026:RJ-JP:9442] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1847/2026] case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Shubham Kuntal S/o Sobran Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/50