Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53449 (KAR)

ROOPESH S/O GAJANAN SHIRODKAR v. SRINIVASRAO S/O SHESHAGIRIRAO LINGAMANENI

CRL.RP/100397/2022 · 2026-01-30

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1257 CRL.RP No. 100397 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100397 OF 2022 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: ROOPESH S/O GAJANAN SHIRODKAR AGE. 34 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. GUDDAD ONI, SHIGGAON, TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI-581205. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHISHEK BARIGIDAD, ADVOCATE) AND: SRINIVASRAO S/O SHESHAGIRIRAO LINGAMANENI AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. RAJEEV NAGAR, VIDHYA NAGAR,HOUSE NO.121 HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. KAVYA C. SHETTAR, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 03.10.2022 PASSED BY THE LD. I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HAVERI IN CRL.A NO.7/2022 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 27.01.2022 PASSED BY THE LD. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIGGOAN IN C.C. NO. 153/2020 AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 138 OF N.I ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1257 CRL.RP No. 100397 of 2022 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Memo is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed the same and has no objection. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the petition stands disposed of. 4. If the amount agreed as per the memo is not paid, the respondent is at liberty to execute the order in accordance with law. 5. The amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant upon due identification. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC List No.: 3 Sl No.: 13