- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1411 CRL.RP No. 100440 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100440 OF 2022 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI. MAYUR SUBHASH GENJI AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. HINDU NAGAR, BELAGAVI, TQ AND DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C.S SHETTAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SHRI SACHIN S/O. ASHOK MANE AGE.41 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, R/O. PLOT NO.105, 3RD CROSS, SHRI HARI KRUPAD GANESH MARG, R.C. NAGAR, BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MAHANTESH S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 AND 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO CALL FOR TCR AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.07.2022 PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BELAGAVI IN CRL. A NO. 156/2022 AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE CONVICTION ORDER DATED 19.04.2022 PASSED BY THE VI J.M.F.C. COURT, AT BELAGAVI IN C.C. NO.330/2019 FOR THE OFFENCE U/SEC. 138 N.I. ACT. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.03 15:09:51 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1411 CRL.RP No. 100440 of 2022 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. A Joint memo has been filed by the parties, which reads as under: JOINT MEMO “Herein, the joint memo on behalf of Revision Petitioner and Respondent is as under:- That, the Respondent/complainant has filed the case as against the Rev. Petitioner/accused for the offence punishable U/Sec.138 of N.I. Act. After recording the evidence the Hon'ble VI Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC Belagavi convicted the Petitioner for the offence punishable U/sec. 138 of N.I. Act in C.C.No.330/2019. and the same is confirmed by the VI addl. District and Session Judge Belagavi in Cr. Appeal No: 156/2022. Thereafter, the Revision Petitioner/accused preferred this revision petition being aggrieved by the judgement of conviction of Hon'ble trial court and first appellate court before this Hon'ble Court. Now the matter is settled amicably between the parties for Rs.1,00,000/-. That, the Revision petitioner/accused has already deposited an amount of Rs.56,000/-(Rupees Fifty Six Thousand only) before the Trial court out of total compensation amount i.e. Rs. 1,12,000/-(one Lakh twelve thousand only). During pendency of the above Revision Petition the Petitioner has paid Rs.20,000/- to the Respondent/Complainant and agrees to pay the remaining - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1411 CRL.RP No. 100440 of 2022 amount of Rs. 24,000/- to the Respondent/Complainant within 2 months in 2 instalments and will deposit the same before the Trial Court. And the amount deposited i.e., Rs.56,000/ may be released in favour of respondent/compalinant. Hence, it is most humbly prayed that, the top noted case may kindly be compounded and conviction and Sentence in C.C. NO. 330/2019 confirmed by VI Addl. District and Session Judge may be set aside on the above mentioned terms and condition in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Counsel for respondent has endorsed no objection. 3. Placing the memo on record, the petition stands disposed of. 4. However, it is made clear that if the amount agreed in the memo is not paid, the respondent is at liberty to execute the impugned order in accordance with law. 5. The amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/- CT:CMU LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 17