Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53420 (KAR)

SRI SUBHASH SANGAPPA HIRAL S/O SANGAPPA v. SMT M K VISHALAKSHI

CCC/100303/2025 · 2026-01-19

B Muralidhara Pai, M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:475-DB CCC No. 100303 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100303 OF 2025 (-) BETWEEN: SRI. SUBHASH SANGAPPA HIRAL, S/O SANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT GULEDUGUDD POST, BADAMI TALUK, BAGALKOTE DISTRICT 587203 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MADANGOUDA NARASAGOUDA PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. M K VISHALAKSHI, THE SECRETARY OF THE KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001. 2. SMT. S. SARASWATHI BAI, THE JOINT SECRETARY OF THE KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001. …ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AG OFFICE DHARWAD HIGH COURT BENCH, DHARWAD 580001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, ADV. FOR A1 AND A2; SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR PROFORMA R3) Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:475-DB CCC No. 100303 of 2025 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE ACCUSED PERSONS TO COMPLY THE ORDER TO CONTINUE THE COMPLAINANTS IN THE PRESENT PLACE OF WORK AS A DALAYAT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSON FOR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE VIOLATION OF THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2024 IN W.P. NO. 107082/2024 (S-DIS) VIDE ANNEXURE-“A” IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) The present contempt petition is filed with a prayer to enforce the interim order passed in Writ Petition No.107082/2024. 2. It is submitted that in the aforesaid writ petition, the State has filed an application for vacating the interim order passed, in respect which the present contempt petition is filed. It is further submitted that the learned counsel for the complainant herein has undertaken that he would not - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:475-DB CCC No. 100303 of 2025 precipitate the contempt proceedings in the light of the matter being heard by the learned Single Judge. 3. Under such circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that, it would meet the ends of justice, if the contempt petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the complainant to file a fresh contempt petition in accordance with law if any enforceable orders were to be passed in the writ petition and if it is not complied by the State. Ordered accordingly. Contempt petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE KMS CT-CNB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2