IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1062/2026 Decided on: 09.01.2026 Ranbir Singh & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Motta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 and 3, respectively. 2. Petitioners seek arrears from the date of regularization i.e. 07.10.2020. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners collectively represented to respondents No.2 & 3 on 21.12.2025 (Annexure P-9-colly) for the redressal of their grievances, but the said representations have not been considered and decided 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 till date. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents are not averse to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing respondents No.2 & 3/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 09th January, 2026(rohit)