Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53412 (KAR)

SHARADA W/O GEERISH NANDANAWAD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/103713/2025 · 2026-01-05

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:13 CRL.P No. 103713 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103713 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SHARADA W/O. GEERISH NANDANAWAD AGE 46 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O. MADARMADDI JAI BHIM NAGAR, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI, DHARWAD CITY-580020. 2. SMT. SUNITA ANAND KOLAKAR AGE 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O SAYADAGALLI, CHIKKODI, TQ. CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 3. SMT. UMA W/O. RAVI HEBBALLI AGE 39 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE R/O. BASAVA NELAYA OPPOSITE HALADIPUR HOUSE SARASWATHIPUR, KALAGHATAGI ROAD, DHARWAD-580001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHRIKANT T. PATIL AND SRI. ROHIT S. PATIL, ADVOCATES) Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:13 CRL.P No. 103713 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH DHARWAD TOWN PS, R/BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH, AT DHARWAD 580011. 2. SMT. AMBIKA SHANKAR TUMKI AGE 41 YEARS, OCC. LABOURER R/O. MADARMADDI JAIBHIM NAGAR DAHRWAD, HUBBALLI DHARWAD CITY-580020. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 528 OF BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO QUASH CHARGE SHEET AND INITIATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN TOWN P.S. DHARWAD CRIME NO.185/2021 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 324, 341, 323, 504, 34, 506, OF IPC, 1860 WHICH IS REGISTERED AS C.C. NO.539/2022 WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE II ND ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC -II DHARWAD IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS HEREIN/ ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 ARE CONCERNED IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.,. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:13 CRL.P No. 103713 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. After addressing the arguments for some time, a memo came to be filed. The memo reads as under: “Memo “Herein the advocate for petitioners submit the files this memo as under: 1) That the petitioners are withdrawing the petition with a liberty to urge all the grounds in the trial. With the observation is withdrawing the above petition in the ends of justice.” 2. Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 54