- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1306 CRL.P No. 100605 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100605 OF 2021 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SMT. LATA DEVI W/O SADASHIVANANDA DANDIN AGE 48 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. SIDDALINGA NAGAR, GADAG, DIST GADAG-582101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. J.S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHIVANAND S/O KASHAPPA DANDIN AGE 66 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. SHIVANAND NAGAR, TQ GADAG, DIST GADAG-582101. 2. SHANKAR S/O KASHAPPA DANDIN AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. SHIVANAND NAGAR, TQ GADAG, DIST GADAG-582101. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GADAG TOWN POLICE STATION AUTHORITIES, BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.G. KADADAKATTI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R3) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO THE ORDER DATED 10.02.2020 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE GADAG IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.05/2020 SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11-4-2019 PASSED BY THE FIRST JMFC GADAG IN C.C.NO.3233/2014 CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.04 12:57:36 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1306 CRL.P No. 100605 of 2021 ON THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 319 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, MAY BE SET ASIDE BY ALLOWING THIS CRIMINAL PETITION WITH COST THROUGHOUT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Present petition is filed by the wife, who is the defacto complainant, challenging the order dated 10.02.2020 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gadag1, in Criminal Revision Petition No.05/2020. 2. By the said order, the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court allowed the revision petition and set aside the order dated 11.04.2019 passed by the JMFC-I Court, Gadag in C.C. No.3233/2014 on an application filed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 3. The State has not preferred any petition against the said order. 1 For short, ‘the First Appellate Court’ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1306 CRL.P No. 100605 of 2021 4. Since no procedings has been instituted by the State, and in the absence of obtaining the necessary permission, the present petition filed by the wife challenging the order passed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court cannot be maintained. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM CT:CMU LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 6