Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement :13.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010449322023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 23313/2023 Between: 1. P FAREED KHAN, S/O P.RAZAK KHAN, R/O. H.NO. 11/192, JAMICHANWADI STREET, ADONI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE SECRETARIATE, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-A.P 2. THE VIGILANCE COMMISSIONER, ANDHRA PRADESH, VIGILANCE COMMISSION, AMARAVATI. 3. THE REGIONAL VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT, KURNOOL. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CID, REGIONAL OFFICE KURNOOL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a mandamus declaring the action in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 13.09.2022 by not taking any action against the Tahsildar of Nandhyala, Pattikonda Mandal and Adoni Mandal for the offence of cheating, Fraud and misappropriation in their part of duties by Sub-Dividing the petitioner schedule land is wholly illegal, arbitrary, 2 unjust, contrary to the principles of natural justice besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and / or pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Heard Mr. Sai Kiran, learned counsel representing Mr. S.V.S.S. Siva Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R. Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, and Mr. Neelothpal Ganji, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for Respondent No.4-CID. 2. Mr. Sai Kiran, learned counsel representing Mr. S.V.S.S. Siva Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petitioner is no more and that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 3. In view of the above submission, the Writ Petition is closed, as no further orders are necessary. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date: 13.07.2026 KNN Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 57 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 23313/2023 Date: 13.07.2026 KNN