Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5338 (GAU)

M/S V.S.R. ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/1188/2026 · 2026-04-28

Devashis Baruah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010071302026 2026:GAU-AS:5897 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1188/2026 M/S V.S.R. ENTERPRISES HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT H/NO. 2, MILIJULI PATH, BELTOLA TINIALI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781028 AND REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED AGENT MR. RAJAPPA NANJUNDA PRASAD SON OF SRI SIDDAPPA RAJAPPA, AGED AROUND 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BLOCK NO. AB5, QTR. NO. 12, G.M.C. NEW COLONY, P.O. BHARALUMKUKH, P.S. FATASIL AMBARI, GUWAHATI- 781009. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECY. WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. HAVING ITS AT WATER RESOURCES DEPTT., HAVING OFFICE AT WATER RESOURCES DEPTT., BLOCK C, 3RD FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR 6 2:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MARIGAON WATER RESOURCES DIVISION ERAGAON WARD NO. 6 NEAR TARUN FIELD P.O. MORIGAON DISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM- 782105. 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ASSAM WATER CENTRE 5TH FLOOR NEAR ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE BHAWAN BASISTHA Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI DISTRICT KAMRUP (M) PIN 781029. 4:THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN RAFI MARG NEW DELHI110001. 5:THE CHAIRMAN BRAHMAPUTRA BOARD MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI BASISTHA GUWAHATI 78102 Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. A Choudhury Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. K Gogoi, CGC B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 29.04.2026 This is an application for impleadment of the opposite party Nos.4 and 5 to the accompanying writ petition. 2. Taking into account the stand which has been taken by the Water Resources Department, it is the opinion of this Court that the presence of the opposite party Nos.4 and 5 would be necessary for the purpose of proper adjudication of the accompanying writ petition. Page No.# 3/3 3. Accordingly the opposite party Nos.4 and 5 are impleaded as respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to the accompanying writ petition. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties within 7(seven) days from today before the Registry of this Court and the Registry on the basis of the instant order as well as the fresh memo of parties shall make the necessary correction in the cause-title of the writ petition and update the same in the CIS. 5. Interlocutory application stands disposed of in the above terms. JUDGE Comparing Assistant