Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53379 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER v. SMT. KASTURAVVA W/O BHIMAPPA IRAGAR

MFA/104209/2022 · 2026-01-20

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:593 MFA No. 104209 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.104209/2022 (MV-D) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, AARYA IDIGA HOSTEL COMPLEX, BALLARI, IN APPEAL REP. BY DULY CONSTITUTED AUTHORITY, THE REGIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, SUMANGALA COMPLEX, LAMINGATON ROAD, HUBBALLI. - APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.K. SOUDAGAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. KASTURAVVA W/O. BHIMAPPA IRAGAR, AGE 44 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. SANKANUR, TAL. YALABURGA, DIST. KOPPAL-583226. 2. BHIMAVVA D/O. BHIMAPPA IRAGAR, AGE 19 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. SANKANUR, TQ. YALABURGA, DIST. BALLARI-583226. 3. CHANNAVEERAYYA S/O. SHIVAPURAYYA, AGE 30 YEARS, OCC. MACHINE OPERATOR, R/O. MALEKOPPA, TQ. YALABURGA, DIST. KOPPAL-583232. 4. UMESH YATTINAMANI, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. MADALAPUR, TQ. MADINUR, TAL. AND DIST. KOPPAL-583232. - RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.A. NINGOJI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:593 MFA No. 104209 of 2022 NOTICE TO R3 IS DISPENSED WITH (V/O/DATED 20.10.2025); NOTICE TO R4 IS SERVED) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 173 (1) OF M.V. ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 09.09.2022 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO. 379/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, YALABURGA AND ETC. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Memo is filed by the appellant seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Memo is taken on record. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by it before this Court. All I.As. in this appeal shall stand closed. SD/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI BVV/ CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32