VIJAY S/O VEERABADHRAYYA PUJAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/103458/2023 · 2026-02-03
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53362 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53362 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1515 CRL.P No. 103458 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103458 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
VIJAY S/O VEERABADHRAYYA PUJAR AGE. 27 YEARS, OCC. GOVT OFFICIAL NON GAZETTED R/O. NARENDRA, TQ DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD.
2.
MAHADEVI W/O VEERABADHRAYYA PUJAR AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NARENDRA, TQ DHARWAD, DIST DHARWAD.
3.
VEERABADHRAYYA S/O BASAYYA PUJAR AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC GOVT OFFICIAL NO GAZETTED, R/O. NARENDRA, TQ DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD.
4.
NAGRAJ S/O VEERABADHRAYYA PUJAR AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC GOVT OFFICIAL NON GAZETTED R/O. NARENDRA, TQ. DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHETAN KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SPP THROUGH DHARWAD WOMAN PS, SPP OFFICE HIGH COURT OF KARNARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD.
2.
SHILPA W/O VIJAYA PUJAR AGE. 26 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O NARENDRA, TQ. DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND CHARGE SHEET AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN DHARWAD WOMEN P.S. CRIME NO.0007/2022 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 323, 498A, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.04 12:57:41 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1515 CRL.P No. 103458 of 2023
IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 4TH ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DHARWAD.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. The office, after verifying National Judicial Data Grid, has noticed that the present petition has become rendered infructuous, in view of the disposal of the main matter before the Trial Court.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
RHR/- CT:CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 3