Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53337 (KAR)

YALLAPPA S/O SANNABASAPPA KARIYAMMANAVAR v. SHARANAMMA KHARI

CCC/100269/2025 · 2026-01-13

B Muralidhara Pai, M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:321-DB CCC No. 100269 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100269 OF 2025 BETWEEN: YALLAPPA S/O SANNABASAPPA KARIYAMMANAVAR, AGE. 83 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. MEVUNDI, TQ./DIST. HAVERI-581 110. & COMPLAINANT (BY SRI RAMACHANDRA V. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI NANDISH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHANNAPPA H.B., ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HAVERI, SUB-DIVISION, HAVERI, TQ./DIST. HAVERI-581 110. 2. SHARANAMMA KHARI, THE TAHASILDAR, HAVERI, TQ./DIST. HAVERI-581 110. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY AGA. & ACCUSED (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, ADVOCATE FOR A1 AND A2; SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR PROFORMA R3;) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS, ACT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR DELIBERATELY DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 22-07- 2024 PASSED IN W.P. NO.105600/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.01.22 11:05:47 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:321-DB CCC No. 100269 of 2025 THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) 1. This Court on 22.07.2024 in WP No.105600/2022, has passed the following order: <i. Petition is allowed. ii) Writ of mandamus is issued to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner vide Annexures-E, F, G, J and pass suitable orders in accordance with law within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.= The present contempt petition was filed on the ground that the said order had not been complied with. 2. Today, counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2/accused Nos. 1 and 2 has filed a memo along with the endorsements issued by the Tahasildar, Haveri to the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:321-DB CCC No. 100269 of 2025 complainant dated 12.01.2026, which states that the request of the complainant has been rejected. 3. In our opinion, this amounts to compliance of the order passed in WP No.105600/2022. Accordingly, the contempt petition is hereby dismissed, reserving liberty to the complainant to challenge the endorsement, if he is so advised. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE VB CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 9