[2026:RJ-JP:13829] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3601/2026 Rajendra Kumar Saini S/o Shri Chhitar Mal Saini, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Rampura Pyau, Tehsil Khandela, Sathiya Vas, Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Au Small Finance Bank, Branch At Khasra No. 132, Barsinghpura Road, Khandela Bye- Pass, Khandela, District Sikar Through Branch Manager. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Fageriya For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha with Ms. Sunita Meena for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Dikshant Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 02/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition; and further be pleased to direct the respondents to de-freeze the saving account number 2501219466205688 with the Respondent AU Small Finance Bank Branch at Khasra No. 132, Barsinghpura Road, Khandela Bye-pass, Khandela, District Sikar IFSC Code AUBL0002194 and allow the petitioner to make transaction in its bank account regularly. Any other order/ direction /relief which this Hon’ble Court deems proper in the facts and [2026:RJ-JP:13829] (2 of 4) [CW-3601/2026] circumstances of the case may also be passed in favor of the petitioner along with cost.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never misused the aforesaid bank account for the purpose of illegal transactions and has not committed any cyber crime and has no relation whatsoever to the alleged fraudulent transaction(s). 3. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the Investigating Agencies and will appear before the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies as and when called upon. 4. Therefore, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be allowed to operate and carry out the banking transactions from the said bank account. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent – Bank submits that the credit entry of the disputed amount of Rs.2,81,694/- has been duly reversed on 21.02.2026 by debiting the bank account of the petitioner. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent – Bank further submits that the petitioner may be directed not to discontinue the bank account until the investigation is completed or the criminal case is decided. 7. Learned counsel for the respondent – State submits that as the petitioner is the beneficiary of an amount involved in a financial cyber fraud complaint and the investigation is undergoing, no interference is called for at this stage. 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees with the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent – Bank. [2026:RJ-JP:13829] (3 of 4) [CW-3601/2026] 9. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 10. Taking into consideration the aforementioned submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent – Bank as an admitted fact, there is no occasion for the respondent – Bank to not to de-freeze the saving bank account of the petitioner having account No.2501219466205688 maintained with respondent No.2 – AU Small Finance Bank Branch at Khasra No. 132, Barsinghpura Road, Khandela Bye-pass, Khandela, District Sikar. Thus, the respondent No.2 – Bank is directed to de-freeze the bank account No.2501219466205688 of the petitioner maintained with respondent No.2 – AU Small Finance Bank Branch at Khasra No. 132, Barsinghpura Road, Khandela Bye-pass, Khandela, District Sikar positively within a period of three days from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. 11. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 12. It is made clear that the petitioner will co-operate with the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies and will appear before them as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue the bank account till the Investigating Agencies and Bank Authorities permit the petitioner to do so. 13. It is further ordered that after investigation, if the involvement of the petitioner is found in any illegal transaction, the petitioner shall be liable to pay amount involved in the aforesaid illegal transaction and will face inquiry/investigation as per law. 14. Needless to say, that this order has been passed only in the context of de-freezing of the bank account of the petitioner and in [2026:RJ-JP:13829] (4 of 4) [CW-3601/2026] no manner is to be construed as any determination with respect to the merits of the financial cyber fraud complaint under question. 15. Additionally, it is directed that the petitioner shall ensure that all the compliances required for maintaining and operating its bank account with the respondent – Bank are duly complied with. 16. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DANISH USMANI /31