Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5331 (RAJ)

KURSHID ALIAS KHURSHID S/O RUSTAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3916/2026 · 2026-03-24

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12305] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3916/2026 Kurshid Alias Khurshid S/o Rustam, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Jotri Pahari, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (Presently Accused In Judicial Custody At District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.K. Dixit For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP Mr. Shivam Sharma for Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 24/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.9/2026 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that a cross-case has also been registered against the present petitioner, in which six injuries were inflicted upon him. He submits that though there are allegations regarding the infliction of injuries but none of the injuries sustained are dangerous to life. Petitioner is [2026:RJ-JP:12305] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3916/2026] behind the bars since 13.02.2026. He further submits that two criminal antecedents have been reported against the present petitioner; however, in both cases, he has been granted bail. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, accordingly, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Kurshid Alias Khurshid S/o Rustam, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/73