[2026:RJ-JP:11849] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3209/2026 Mukesh S/o Manmohan, R/o Jhareda, Police Station Sadar Hin- don, District Karauli, Rajasthan (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj P Sharma Ms. Sneha Gulati, Ms. Nikita Sharma and Ms. Shruti For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Munesh Kumar (Dy. SP), Hindaun City, Karauli HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No.279/2025 dated 03.07.2025 registered at Police Station Hindon Sadar, District Karauli for the offences under Sections 103(1), 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act. 2. Learned counsel submitted that the complete allegations levelled by the complainant in the FIR are false and baseless and the petitioner has no involvement in the alleged incident. It is further submitted that after conducting the investigation, Police has filed the charge-sheet on 19.10.2025 and trial has not yet commenced. It is further submitted that two alleged eye- [2026:RJ-JP:11849] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3209/2026] witnesses namely, Ravi Gurjar and Ravindra @ Popla have not named the present petitioner in their statements. Therefore, the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused persons namely, Tapendra @ Chomu and Om Hari, who have already been granted bail by the co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 15.01.2026 and 18.12.2025 respectively. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Mr. Munesh Kumar (Dy. SP), Hindaun City, District Karauli, is present in person before this Court in compliance of the previous order dated 12.03.2026, whereby he was directed to produce the FSL report. He submits that till date, the FSL report has not been received. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the bail application and submits that the present petitioner, along with the other co-accused persons, was involved in causing injuries to the deceased, which ultimately resulted in his death. It has been pointed out that, as per the conclusion recorded in the charge- sheet, the cause of death is attributable to the injuries sustained, including internal damage to the stomach. 5. This Court has considered the statements of two eye- witnesses recorded under Section 164 CrPC. However, it appears that both witnesses were not present throughout the entire incident and had left midway when they were unable to control the situation involving the persons causing injuries. 6. This Court while considering the statements of eye witnesses noted that the present petitioner was not named by them cannot [2026:RJ-JP:11849] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3209/2026] by itself be a ground to grant bail to the petitioner. The material on record indicates that the deceased was alone at the spot who suffered serious injuries at the hands of the petitioner along with other persons and died due to the said injuries. 6. Having considered to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the gravity and nature of the offence, but without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, this Court does not find it a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS, is dismissed. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J PAYAL DHAWAN /44