SUBHASH PRAMANIK @ PRAKASH PRAMANIK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/171/2026 · 2026-03-10
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 533 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 533 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2026:JHHC:6242-DB)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. A (D.B.) No. 171 of 2026 --------- Subhash Pramanik @ Prakash Pramanik, aged about 28 years, son of Mahesh Pramanik residence of Village-Baruhatu, P.O. & P.S.-Bundu, District-Ranchi
… … Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Appellant : Mr. Sourabh Kumar Das, Advocate For the Resp. State : Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. ----------- 02/Dated: 10th March, 2026 I.A. No.1844 of 2026
1. Heard Mr. Sourabh Kumar Das, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P.
2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 36 days in filing of this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 36 days in filing of this appeal is hereby, condoned.
3. I.A. No.1844 of 2026 stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.171 of 2026
4. This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the learned A.J.C-XVIII, Ranchi in B.P. No.1209 of 2025 in connection with Bundu P.S. Case No.33 of 2014(s), whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
(2026:JHHC:6242-DB)
5. It has been alleged that there was an exchange of firing between the police personnel and the extremists and three extremists were apprehended at the spot and several incriminating articles were recovered.
6. Submission has been advanced by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been implicated in this case on the confessional statement of the apprehended accused persons. Learned counsel submits that the appellant is in custody since 26.06.2025.
7. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.
8. Regard being had to the manner of implication of the appellant, we, while setting aside the order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the learned A.J.C-XVIII, Ranchi in B.P. No.1209 of 2025 in connection with Bundu P.S. Case No.33 of 2014(s), direct the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi.
9. This appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
10/03/2026
Pappu/-