SR Minerals Rep by its Proprietor VRamesh v. Viswa Jyothi Exim alias Logistic Private Limited
CRLRC/1/2026 · 2026-04-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 533 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 533 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010720132025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1/2026 Between:
1. SR MINERALS REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR VRAMESH, S/O LATE SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.
NO. 6-1, KRISHNARAYAPURAM,CHINNA MUSHIDIWADA, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. V RAMESH, S/O LATE SAMBASIVA RAOOCC PROPRIETOR M/S.
S.R. MINERALS,AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-93- 6,SECTOR-V, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. VISWA JYOTHI EXIM ALIAS LOGISTIC PRIVATE LIMITED, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR K. SUBRAHMANYA DATTATREYADATTU RAJU S/O LATE SRI K.V.S.N. RAJU, OCC BUSINESS,AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 58-14-46/1, MARRIPALEM,VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM-09,
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTORHIGH COURT OF AP AT AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Revision Petition and modify the order dated 21-11-2025 made in CrI.M.P. No. 1158 of 2025 in Crl.
Appeal No.430 of 2025 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Visakhapatnam by setting aside the condition of imposing the deposit of 20% of cheque amount while suspending the sentence imposed in CC No. 194 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble II Special Magistrate: Visakhapatnam, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to SUSPEND the operation of judgment dated 14-10-2025 made in CC No. 194 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble II Special Magistrate: Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of main Criminal Revision Case, and to pass
2 IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to EXTEND the time for compliance of the condition imposed i.e. deposit of 10% of cheque amount through the order dated 06.01.2026 made in lA No. 1 of 2026 in CrI.R.C. No. 01 of 2026, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. 3 The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Revision Case under Sections 438 and 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners / Appellants seeking to modify the order dated 21.11.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1158of 2025 in Crl.A.No.430 of 2025 on the file of the Court of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam by setting aside the condition of depositing 20% of the compensation before the Trial Court within 60 days from the date of the said Order.
2. Heard Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Petitioners and the respondent No.1 are companies registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. Further, the respondent No.1 forcibly obtained the cheques from the petitioners and the petitioners are seriously disputing the issuance of cheque in favour of the respondent No.1. Out of business dealings, there are money transactions between the two companies and in view of the serious financial disputes between the parties, the petitioner company could not pay the 20% of the cheque amount as ordered by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam in Crl.M.P.No.1158 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.430 of 2025, dated 21.11.2025. Hence, prayed to set aside the impugned order to the extent of depositing the cheque amount.
4
4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is
disposed of directing the petitioners for depositing 20% of the cheque amount as ordered by the learned Sessions Judge, within one week from today.
Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed.
Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 17.04.2026 Mjl/* CC by today
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.R.C.No. 01 of 2026
Dt.17.04.2026
Mjl/*