Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5329 (GAU)

M/S LUNIA MARKETING PVT. LTD. v. THE LD. TECHNICAL MEMBER OF THE RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GUWAHATI BENCH AND 4 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/225/2026 · 2026-05-03

Manish Choudhury

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010080522026 2026:GAU-AS:6033 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/225/2026 M/S LUNIA MARKETING PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTOR, MR. MANOJ KUMAR LUNIA, HAVING PLACE OF BUSINESS AT NEAR CHERRA BUS STAND, BARA BAZAR, P.O.- SHILLONG, MEGHALAYA VERSUS THE LD. TECHNICAL MEMBER OF THE RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GUWAHATI BENCH AND 4 ORS. STATION ROAD, OPPOSITE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781001 2:THE CHAIRMAN RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL HAVING OFFICE AT PRINCIPLE BENCH 13/15 MALL ROAD DELHI-110054 3:ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH HAVING OFFICE AT PRINCIPLE BENCH 13/15 MALL ROAD DELHI-110054 4:ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI BENCH HAVING OFFICE AT STATION ROAD OPPOSITE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781001 Page No.# 2/2 5:UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM- 78101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. DIVYANSH RATHI, MR. DIVYAM RATHI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 04.05.2026 Heard Mr. D. Rathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. After hearing Mr. Rathi at some length, Mr. Rathi has submitted that the petitioner be granted leave to withdraw the contempt petition in order to file afresh in proper form. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Rathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant