SRI. KIRAN S/O. PARASHURAM GANJIKATTI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/100702/2021 · 2026-01-27
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53286 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53286 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:942 CRL.P No. 100702 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100702 OF 2021 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN:
SRI. KIRAN S/O. PARASHURAM GANJIKATTI AGE. 28 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NARAGUND, TQ. NARAGUND, DIST. GADAG-582207. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAREDDY SAHUKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR RON POLICE STATION, DIST.GADAG, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-580010.
2.
SMT. SHASHIKALA W/O. SANGAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC:HOME MAKER, R/O: KONGAWAD, TQ:NAVALGUND, DIST: DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. CHETAN T. LIMBIKAI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DATED 06.01.2020 IN C.C.NO.8/2020 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC RON AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 279,337,338,304A OF IPC AND SEC 134(A) AND (B), 187, 3 R/W SEC.
181, 5 R/W SEC 180, 194 A R/W 177 OF M.V.ACT.
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.01.29 11:03:29 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:942 CRL.P No. 100702 of 2021
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1.
Learned counsel Sri.Chetan T. Limbikai, appearing for respondent No.2, would submit that main matter itself has been
disposed of before the trial Magistrate, as per the data obtained from National Judicial Data Grid.
2. The petitioner is the accused No.2, who has paid the fine and the since the proceedings against him have logically ended, the prayer made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
RHR/-CT:ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23