Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53267 (KAR)

SHRI.SIDDHANATH TRACTORS v. M/S. JINA FORCE

CRL.P/100525/2021 · 2026-02-05

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1675 CRL.P No. 100525 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100525 OF 2021 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. SIDDHANATH TRACTORS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI SANJAY BHANUDAS PATIL, AGE 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. GALA NO.33, 34 AND 35, MARKET YARD, OPP. PANCHAYAT SAMITI, SHIRA, DIST. SANGLI, MAHARASHTRA-415408. 2. SRI. SANJAY S/O BHANUDAS PATIL AGE 46 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. MIRAJ, DIST. SANGLI, MAHARASHTRA-516410. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. R.M. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. JINA FORCE PROPRIETOR JYOTSNA APPASAHEB JINAGOUDA REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI. SWAGAT APPASAHEB JINAGOUDA, AGE 41 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 206/9, CITIZEN SOCIETY, NEAR HINDUJA HOSPITAL, CADELL ROAD, MAHIM, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA-400016, BRANCH AT SATTUR, DHARWAD. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHIVAPRASAD PATIL AND SRI. P.R. BETUR, ADVOCATES) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2020 IN PC NO. 426/2020 (CC NO.1411/2020) ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DHARWAD IS PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1675 CRL.P No. 100525 of 2021 CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT, AGAINST PETITIONER NO.1 / ACCUSED NO.1 AND PETITIONER NO.2 / ACCUSED NO.2. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. It is submitted by the counsel for both the petitioner and respondent that the matter in the trial Court is listed for final arguments, and at this stage, no orders can be passed in the present petition. 2. In view of the submission made by the counsel for parties, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/-CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 27