IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.414 of 2026 Decided on: 06.01.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Satish Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors . …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents- State. Mr. Sourabh Chand, Advocate vice Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate for respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief claimed by the petitioner is not in order, the substantive prayer of the petitioner is not in terms of the pleadings and pleadings are also lacking in material particular, therefore, petitioner be permitted to withdraw the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - present writ petition with liberty reserved for him to file fresh writ petition in accordance with law. 2. Granting such liberty, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge January 6, 2026 R.Atal