Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5322 (JHR)

RANTHA ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1318/2026 · 2026-03-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7299 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1318 of 2026 Rantha Oraon, aged about 23 years, son of Late Somra Oraon, resident of Kharka Bombo Toli, P.O. & P.S. Gumla, District Gumla ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P.P --- 02/17.03.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Gumla P.S.Case No. 379 of 2024, corresponding to S.T. Case No. 25 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 103(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S. Act, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the prosecution has failed to establish the motive of the petitioner for commission of the alleged offence. He further submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in jail since 03.11.2024; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He lastly submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this Court. 4. Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the Petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner, coupled with the fact that petitioner is languishing in custody since 03.11.2024, I am inclined to enlarge the Petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above-named Petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two 2026:JHHC:7299 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Gumla, in connection with Gumla P.S.Case No. 379 of 2024, corresponding to S.T. Case No. 25 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the Petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this Petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this Petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th March, 2026 jk Uploaded on 18/03/2026