SRI RAJKIRAN S/O SHANKAR POL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/103449/2025 · 2026-02-05
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53210 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53210 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1695 CRL.P No. 103449 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103449 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI RAJKIRAN S/O SHANKAR POL AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR, R/O. H.NO. 34 BALEKUNDRI B.K., BELAGAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-591103.
2.
SMT. MAHADEVI W/O SHANKAR POL, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. H.NO. 34 BALEKUNDRI B.K., BELAGAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-591103. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR APPANNA APARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH MARIHAL PS, BELAGAVI, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD-580002.
2.
SMT. SHARAVATI W/O RAJKIRAN POL AGE 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/AT: H.NO. 26, SHRI SAI NILAY SHIVNAGAR BADAVANE, 2ND CROSS, TIMMASAGARA ROAD, NEKAR NAGAR, HUBBALLI, BANDIGANI, TQ.HUBBALLI, DIST.DHARWAD-580020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
NOTICE SERVED TO R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR, CHARGE SHEET, ENTIRE
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1695 CRL.P No. 103449 of 2025
PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER DATED 02.05.2025 PASSED BY THE III RD ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC BELAGAVI IN CC NO.1279/2025 THEREBY TAKING COGNIZANCE FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S. 498A, 323, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF THE IPC AND ALLOW THE ABOVE CRIMINAL PETITION AS AGAINST PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Case called out, none present on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation.
2. Suo motu this Court listed the matter to today in the interest of justice.
3. On perusal of the material on record, it is noticed that the petitioner is challenging the issuance of the process and seeking quashing of the pending proceedings in C.C.No.1279/2025 for the offence under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC.
4. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK_Ct-cmu