Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53199 (KAR)

SRI DEEPAK RAMACHANDRA ANVEKAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/102894/2025 · 2026-02-03

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1526 CRL.P No. 102894 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102894 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI DEEPAK RAMACHANDRA ANVEKAR AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. GOLDSMITH, R/O. BEHIND DURGADEVI TEMPLE, BAAD, TQ. KARWAR, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA. 2. SRI. DARSHAN DEEPAK ANVEKAR AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. BEHIND DURGADEVI TEMPLE, BAAD, TQ. KARWAR, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.B. DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH KARAWAR TOWN P.S. SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD.-560001. 2. SHRI. VIVEKANAND YASHWANTH BAIKERIKAR AGE. 73 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. SONARWADA, BAAD NANDANAGADDA KARWAR, TQ. KARWAR, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE CRIMINAL PETITION BY QUASHING THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 IN KARAWAR TOWN P.S. CRIME. NO. 35/2025 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 316(2), 318(4), CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.04 12:57:40 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1526 CRL.P No. 102894 of 2025 351(2), 3(5) BNS -2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL CIVIL JUDGE (SR DN) AND CJM UTTARA KANNADA, IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 IS CONCERNED AND GRANT ANY OTHER RELIEF, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: “That in the above case, the petitioner has not interested to prosecute the above petition. Therefore, the Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition in the above case to meet the ends of justice. Hence, this memo.” 2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK CT:CMU LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 35