Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53194 (KAR)

SMT. SHAMSHADBEGUM W/O AYUB KATAMBALI v. SMT. RENUKA W/O PRABHUGOUDA PATIOL

CRL.RP/100333/2023 · 2026-02-03

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1520 CRL.RP No. 100333 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100333 OF 2023 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SMT. SHAMSHADBEGUM W/O AYUB KATAMBALI AGE 44 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. MADINA GALLI, RAGATIPETH, WARD NO.3 ILKAL, TQ. HUNGUND, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587 125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIDYASHANKAR G. DALWAI, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. RENUKA W/O. PRABHUGOUDA PATIL AGE 35 YEARS, OCC. PVT. JOB AND BUSINESS, R/O. HOUSE NO.97, HAGEDAL, TQ. HUNGUND, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587 118. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. V.P. VADAVI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 22.02.2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOTE, IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 29/2022 CONFIRMING JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 04.04.2022 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND, IN CC NO. 2018/2021 AND ACQUIT THE ACCUSED/REVISION PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 18 OF N.I. ACT, 1881, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.12 16:42:15 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1520 CRL.RP No. 100333 of 2023 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo. The memo reads as under: “MEMO It is respectfully submitted that, the advocate for the petitioner and respondent jointly submitted that the remaining cheque amount will be deposited within six months in two installment. In the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed no objection. 3. Placing the memo on record, the petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that if any one of the instalments is not paid, the order of the Trial Magistrate, as confirmed by the First Appellate Court, shall stand restored automatically, and the respondent is at liberty to execute the impugned in accordance with law. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1520 CRL.RP No. 100333 of 2023 5. The amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC CT:CMU LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 15