Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24398 RP No. 255 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.255 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
1.
K R SOWJANYA W/O T.P. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O NO. EWS 192, 4TH STAGE, KHB COLONY, KUVEMPU NAGAR, 1ST BLOCK, MYSURU-570023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATHYANARAYANA SINGH R.B., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
MYSURU DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK FEDERATION (NANDINI MILK PARLOUR) BANNUR ROAD, ALANAHALLI POST MVSURU-570 028 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2.
THE DIRECTOR (MARKETING) MYSURU DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK FEDERATION BANNUR ROAD, ALANAHALLI POST, MYSURU-570 028 …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24398 RP No. 255 of 2026
(BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA )
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION.114 R/W ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC 1908 R/W ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO REVIEW ITS ORDER DATED 01.04.2026 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND / OR ISSUE SUCH OTHER DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ABOVE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri. Sathyanarayana Singh R B, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Sri. Yogesh D Naik, learned AGA for respondents.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition to review the order dated 01.04.2026 passed in WP No.9872/2026.
3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and in view of the declaration
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24398 RP No. 255 of 2026
of law made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Ram Chandra Choudary and Others vs. Roop Nagar Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Samiti Limited and Others, reported in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 583, I am of the view that there is no merit on the face of petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
SD/-
(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34