[2026:RJ-JP:12566] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4529/2026 Gudiya Devi W/o Hanuman, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Dhangarthal, Police Station Niwai At Present Resident Of Maharshi Gautam Nagar Vatika, P.s. Shivdaspura, District Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail Niwai, District Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Tyagi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Ugra Sen Yadav Mr. Purushottam Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.153/2024 registered at Police Station Niwai, District Tonk for offences under Sections 143, 323, 308, 452 and 504 IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a woman aged about 32 years and having a one-year-old child has falsely been implicated in the present case on the false and concocted grounds. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. Moreover the co-accused persons named in the FIR i.e. Hanuman and Jagdish have already been [2026:RJ-JP:12566] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4529/2026] enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 27.01.2025 and 26.08.2025 respectively and other co- accused Omprakash and Sitaram have also been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 21.04.2025. Petitioner is behind the bars since 29.02.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Gudiya Devi W/o Hanuman, be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/70