SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S 2026:UHC:3613 BA1 No. 421 of 2026 Aman alias Raja ....Applicant Vs. State of Uttarakhand ......Respondent Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait han i, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. N.S. Kaniyal, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant—Aman alias Raja, S/o Ashwini alias Bittu, R/o Kheda Jatt, P.S. Kotwali Mangalaur, District Haridwar. The Applicant is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No. 327 of 2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali Mangalaur, District Haridwar, for offences punishable under Sections 109(2), 115(2), 125, 351(2) and 352 of B.N.S., 2023. 4. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and has no criminal antecedents. It is submitted that there is no independent witness to the alleged incident and no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the Applicant. Learned counsel for the Applicant further submits that the main role in the alleged offence has been assigned to co-accused Ankit, who has already been granted bail by the trial Court and, therefore, the present Applicant is also entitled to bail on the ground of parity. It is also submitted that no specific role has been attributed to the Applicant either in the FIR or in the statements of the witnesses. According to the learned counsel, the Applicant has been implicated merely because he is acquainted with the co-accused Ankit. 6. Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the bail application; however, he fairly admitted that the main accused has already been granted bail. 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the material available on record, this Court finds that no specific overt act has been attributed to the Applicant and the co-accused having the main role has already been granted bail. This Court is of the view that the case of the present Applicant stands on similar footing and he is entitled to parity. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the Applicant has made out a fit case for grant of bail at this stage. 8. Accordingly, the Bail Application is allowed. 9. Let the Applicant—Aman alias Raja be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that the Applicant shall cooperate with the investigation/trial and shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 11. All pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 12.05.2026 Shiksha