Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53117 (MAD)

R.Saritha v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dcb

WP Crl.(MD)/3927/2026 · 2026-07-16

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3927 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3927 of 2026 R.Saritha, ... Petitioner Vs 1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, DCB, Madurai District. 2. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Palamedu Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent take appropriate action be taken based on the petitioner's complaint dated 02.07.2026. within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.R.Ponnuthai For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy (R1, R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3927 of 2026 ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents take appropriate action be taken based on the petitioner's complaint dated 02.07.2026. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had sent a representation seeking the return of money from one Indira. The earlier complaint given against the said Indira was closed based on the undertaking that she would return money to the petitioner. However, the said Indira refused to return the money. In this regard, the petitioner has lodged another representation before the respondent police. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents police submitted that with respect to money dispute, the earlier complaint received from the petitioner was enquired and closed in CSR No.340 of 2023. Thereafter, the petitioner has given a fresh representation, dated 02.07.2026 and the same is pending for enquiry. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3927 of 2026 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the second respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.07.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 16.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No PNM TO:- 1.The Inspector of Police, DCB, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Palamedu Police Station, Madurai District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3927 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. PNM ORDER IN W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3927 of 2026 16.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis